Jump to content

Whoa What

  • entries
    2
  • comments
    50
  • views
    37,768

The Full Conversation


Aki Dazrold

1,139 views

 Share

I am posting this partly because of the comment McStudz made on my page and mostly to complete the objective.

This was the PM conversation that ensued after I "laid down the law" in the Kreo topic still visible to the public. The PM was originally sent to both me and Cyrem.


Devestater:

Were u (FILL IN THE BLANK :rf: :rf: ) , KREO TOPIC WAS PLACED IN GENERAL DISCUSSIONS!!!!!!!

NOT IN A LRR RELATED DISSCUSION!!! IF U DONT UNLOCK THAT TOPIC, ILL TELL CYREM UR TROLLING ME LIKE U DID WHEN RRU WAS OFFLINE!!!!!! :rf: :rf:

Me:

First of all, Your topic was justifiably locked and the location had nothing to do with it. Second, both of the global mods completely agreed with my decision and in fact applauded it. For the record, This is the second time in RRU's history that Cirevam and I have ever agreed on something. That should say a lot right there.

So go ahead and complain to Cyrem. He won't do a goddamn thing about it, especially since you have no proof that I allegedly trolled you while RRU was offline.

Also the first quarter of your PM here made no goddamn sense.

edit: Oh wait. Judging by who received this PM, Cyrem already knows. Way to jump the gun.

Devestater:

WHY CANT U GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!!! :rf: :rf: :rf: :rf: :rf: :rf: :rf: :rf: i SMELL A TROLL NAMED LZ!!!

LZ UR A MODERATER SO PLEASE ALSO TELL CTXXTC TO STOP TROLLING AND SPAMMING MY PAGE.

Devestater, in a separate comment instead of editing it into his above post:

lz, DID U ADD CYREM TO THIS CONVERSATION?

Me:

I will allow CTXXTC do do whatever he damn well pleases to you on your page, partly because I don't like you and partly because I have no control over him OR anything that gets posted on user pages.

And I most certainly did NOT add him to the conversation. I assumed you had.

Devestater:

[[[He first quotes the above post]]]

LZ THIS IS ENOUGH PROOF THAT CYREM MIGHT TAKE AWAY UR POSITION AND THIS IS PROOF UR TROLLING!!!

FINE ILL DO THE SAME TO CTXXTC LZ. :rf: :rf: :rf:

gLOBAL MODERATERS PLEASE TELL CTXXTC TO STOP TROLLING AND SPAMING ME. :rf:

Me:

Oh yes. I'm TOTALLY going to lose my position because YOU can't process logic, YOU cannot listen to what people repeatedly say, and because YOU are accusing me of trolling you when you have NO proof of such aside from me saying "I don't like you" two replies ago. Also, demanding the global mods leave you alone in a conversation that they cannot see is REALLY gonna get the job done.

Note my sarcasm.

[[[at the time I said this, Addict and Cirevam were not part of the conversation. At some point following this post, he added them in and I didn't notice until a few posts later]]]

Devestater:

[[[He again quotes what I just said. I presume this is when he added the global mods.]]]

SO U WANT ME TO DO THE SAME TO U AND CTXXTC AS CTXXTC DID TO ME? LZ CANT U BAN CTXXTC

Me:

Please do. It will give the global mods and admin a valid and legitimate reason to ban your sorry ass forever.

And no, I cannot ban CTXXTC.

Devestater:

[[[He once again quotes what I just said.]]]

AND CTXXTC COMMENT ON MY PAGE WILL ALSO MAKE THE ADMIN AND GLOBAL MODS BAN CTXXTC.

Devestater, once again posting twice instead of editing his above post:

LZ LETS MAKE CYREM WORK THIS MESS OUT

[[[i could have made a comment about his use of "MAKE" instead of "LET", but I chose to ignore it.]]]

Me:

I don't think that will be necessary. I mean, considering that you have since added the global mods to this conversation, they can take appropriate action since they can do almost everything that he can, and can now see exactly what transpired here.

Devestater:

[[[He again quotes what I just said, then uses another post as "proof", strangely enough not quoting it.]]]

LordZakida, on 01 August 2011 - 02:51 PM, said:

Please do. It will give the global mods and admin a valid and legitimate reason to ban your sorry ass forever.

And no, I cannot ban CTXXTC.

AND CTXXTC COMMENT ON MY PAGE WILL ALSO MAKE THE ADMIN AND GLOBAL MODS BAN CTXXTC.

Marvice:

Devestater, you broke the following rules:

Do Not Spam

Spam refers to posts that are off-topic, contain but a few or excessive characters/emotes or plain advertising. This is not limited to posting, it includes spamming the gallery with images.

Do Not Flame

Flaming refers to insulting someone because of something.

Do Not Troll

Trolling refers to deliberately trying to start an argument, or saying something to provoke a negative response.

You posted your Kreo topic twice* and reposted it in a blog. Three copies of the same topic is considered spam. You just insulted one of the moderators who has been in his position long enough that he knows what he's doing, along with insulting other members. You constantly make posts that bash LEGO, Rock Raiders, and other things this site was CREATED for, which almost always leads to an argument; by now you should know to stop posting those things, but it seems deliberate at this point. That's three strikes against you, and according to this rule...

Warns and Bans

On RRU we utilize a 3 strike warn system. When a user breaks one of the rules he or she will receive a warning. If the user has 3 warnings and proceeds to break a rule once again, the user will receive a ban for 1 week. If a user breaks any rule after a 1 week ban, a permanent ban will take place that will not expire. If you have not received warning for a month or more and have one or more warnings against you, it will decrease by 1.

...you will get a one-week suspension, effective immediately.


That is what you get for calling one of my best friends a lifeless drunk. Consider your debt paid in full.

Objective one of two complete.

  • Like 2
 Share

18 Comments


Recommended Comments

This is the second time in RRU's history that Cirevam and I have ever agreed on something.

Whoa... really? When was the first time?

Well, good for you, ex-LZ-now-Aki. Now, when Deve comes back and trolls some more... [takes Cyrem's hidden Banhammer once more]

Also, could you please shed some light on this last paragraph:

That is what you get for calling one of my best friends a lifeless drunk. Consider your debt paid in full.

Objective one of two complete.

Who, What, When, [not Where, that's pretty obvious], and WHY?

One last thing: [Applauds LZ/Aki for an excellent exhibition of what a Moderator should do.]

Link to comment

While stan praises you as a demigod, I will proceed to *brofist*.

What? I'm not-- What the hack does that mean??

Link to comment

My question is, seeing that, does the warn level decrease after a 1-week ban after a certain period? After all, there a saying about memory and the public, and we all should know what public memory relies on. And I still can have difficulty identifying spam as shown by my chatban.

Do Not Evade Language Filters

This refers to deliberately changing the lettering or using other tricks in order to get around our swear word filter. Slang however is tolerated.

Does this mean I can't censor myself anymore? EX: I can't say that.

Do Not Use Fake Account Details

If you can't trust us, then we can't trust you.

This is also a bit ambigous.

And of course, I forgot to look around before excusing myself in that topic. (You'll find it soon enough) I'll give the original logic here and just link the topic here.

LZ's origial about me page suggested he had a Short Fuze.

Link to comment

The rule in question says in plain English how the warn level works. The other two rules you just referenced do the exact same thing for their respective concerns. How about you at least attempt to read before continuing to spew a steady stream of idiocy everywhere you go?

And as I said in your other topic, my fuse is much, much longer than you think. It was lit a VERY long time ago and I probably would have gone on for another half year, but someone decided to dump a bucket of gas on it.

Link to comment

The rule in question says in plain English how the warn level works. The other two rules you just referenced do the exact same thing for their respective concerns. How about you at least attempt to read before continuing to spew a steady stream of idiocy everywhere you go? And as I said in your other topic, my fuse is much, much longer than you think. It was lit a VERY long time ago and I probably would have gone on for another half year, but someone decided to dump a bucket of gas on it.

So now it is indeed very short. (No troll here, just a logical fact spewer.) So I better be careful.

Dev's PM reeks newbish ignorance. His other posts do too. I mean by this is he looks like this site may have been the first place he has heard of trolling in this contex. I see this in the rage and spelling.

He either is a nine year old who just got the internet, or he is doing a darn good job of acting like one.

Link to comment

My question is, seeing that, does the warn level decrease after a 1-week ban after a certain period? After all, there a saying about memory and the public, and we all should know what public memory relies on. And I still can have difficulty identifying spam as shown by my chatban.

1 month of good behavior will decrease your warning. Chat bans however are not time limited.

Do Not Evade Language Filters

This refers to deliberately changing the lettering or using other tricks in order to get around our swear word filter. Slang however is tolerated.

Does this mean I can't censor myself anymore? EX: I can't say that.

No. This rule is regarding people who try to evade the filter so that people can see the swear word, not the other way round.

Do Not Use Fake Account Details

If you can't trust us, then we can't trust you.

This is also a bit ambigous.

Nope, if you lie in your registration (e.g Age) or use fake emails etc... You will be removed from the forum, I do not want those people on my forum.

Link to comment

So now it is indeed very short. (No troll here, just a logical fact spewer.)

Wrong. It's not short, it's GONE. It burned down. The warhead is lit.

Also, "Logical fact spewer"? Don't make me laugh.

Link to comment

Also, "Logical fact spewer"? Don't make me laugh.

That was the part of the point.

Link to comment

Where did the guy call you this "calling one of my best friends a lifeless drunk. Consider your debt paid in full". I don't see anything like that. I'm not taking sides but i can see you really hate this guy.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.