Leaderboard

I put bricks where they shouldn't go. Three things were learnt from this: The camera distance is set, it does not change when bricks break off. Bricks have no collision The game understands brick positions in float when building a car.

The firmament, or so I've always been told. It's 12:41 AM. Do you know where your punctuation is?

Oh yeah I think I forgot to properly welcome you: Welcome to RRU, we're either mad or completely insane, depends on the season. Don't step on the fungus on your way in though, bad things will happen.

Pro tip: When contacting someone who worked on a game a long time ago, don't expect quick responses, at least not quality if it does manage to be quick. -Experience

welcome - an attack helicopter

I'm an incorrectly phrased winner? Aw you're just too kind.

We are not funerals Ben.

I can't even really bring myself to feel anything about it. It's literally what it says on the tin: every scene we've been seeing in the previews, extended to 5 minutes. No backstory, no context for why the heck this is happening, as much an ad for a story as the actual ads are.

Hi, I'm (relatively) new here. I've been following these forums for about a year or so without a profile, and I decided to finally do something with my profile. So, without futher ado, here's the first mod-... thingy that I created: As you can probably see, It's unfinished, but I wanted to hear some opinions about the general Idea. If you see something (except for the Font) I could improve, please let me know. The backdrop is a test, it is intended to look like an 1920's garage.

being awake

LEGO Island doesn't have any physics at all, period. Also, you mentioned LEGO Island 2, but you didn't mention Island Xtreme Stunts, which fixed some of LEGO Island 2's problems.

I wouldn't play it if there was an official Island 4. I loved the original Lego Island because of its quirkiness, innocence, its farfetched physics and endearing character dialogue. The game's successor, Island 2 didn't capture any of those elements for me, and similarly I fear a fourth instalment would do nothing but tarnish my fond memories of the original and its shark-vomiting pizzeria customers!

[8:32:59 PM] /)¢(\ Krysto: for those wondering - it's hot, sweaty, hard to see, hard to breathe, and somehow still the best thing ever

i'll use it to shoot down all the fake leaving topics i read about in the rules!!

absolutely incredible

O, so ur 1 of those talkerz. Welcome 2 RRU!

Review: Review: #4569 Warrior Review by origamiguy Photo Review So I read Review: Review: #4569 Warrior online. It comes with a tongue-in-cheek and humorous review. I'd like the photo a lot, but I have to say, the lack of anti-aliasing on the text leaves my eyes feeling violated!The review is good for kids who are young, as it is only 3 lines, akin to the review it's reviewing! The review is well thought out, and copies the poor writing style of the prior review for comedic effect. The review is like a good skirt; long enough to cover the material, but short enough to keep it interesting. Rating Design: 9 / 10 (1 mark dropped because it doesn't fit on my screen fully)Quality: 100 / 10 Fun: 1000 / 11 (this one goes up to 11.) Price: 10000 / 10 Is it a read it, or a skip it? I would go with read it for anyone who enjoys meta humour, but if you are not a person who likes fun, then it would be a skip it! Total rating: 9.5 (out of 11)

Review: #4569 Warrior Review by jamesster Photo Review So I read Review: #4569 Warrior online. It comes with an empty-looking review. I'd like the photo a lot, but I have to say, why is there no photo!The review is good for kids who are young, as it is only 3 lines! Also, the writing of the review isn't that good, as it doesn't read that good. But, reading these reviews goes pretty fast! Rating Design: 10 / 10Quality: 100 / 10 Fun: 1000 / 10 Price: 10000 / 10 Is it a read it, or a skip it? I would go with read it for forum users, forum moderators, and forum administrators, but if you are not a person who likes to read stuff, then it would be a skip it! Total rating: 9.5 (out of goldfish)