Jump to content

Ben24x7's abysmal LMB "Legends of Chima" fan-fiction [Documented]


Ben24x7
 Share

Recommended Posts

EDIT - 20/03/2019

Oh for goodness' sake, I thought this stupid fan-fiction had been destroyed after the LEGO Message-Boards were shut down. Turns out my younger self actually bothered to copy/paste/reformat the entirety of the story here in this topic.

 

I'd like to take this moment to say I'm not proud of myself for writing this. This is, quite possibly, the worst thing I've ever written on the internet, period (not even my first posts on this forum, where I was an attention-seeking buffoon with a short-fuse, can top this trash-fire).

This "story" has all the trappings of a really awful fan-fic: an "original character" who is the main focus of the story, a mash-up of different LEGO IPs/ideas/elements, and some of the worst writing/grammar you've ever seen.

...and this was not intended as a joke like "Half-Life: Full Life Consequences" or "legos in spess", this was something I was proud of writing at the age of 13.

 

...well... I'm not proud anymore. If anything, I hate myself for thinking this pile of garbage was worth writing and posting online.

 

 

 

Honestly, I would love to remove this story from RRU, especially since this topic is the last place you'll ever find it (I don't have a copy of it on my computer and since the LEGO Message Boards are dead, so is the version that was on there), but I'm a firm believer that everything deserves to be documented, no matter how minor, no matter how abysmal it is, no matter if it encouraged/inspired another LMB member to write their own bland fan-fic, it deserves to stay.

I know this might be a bit optimistic, but hopefully this terrible fan story will serve as a form of encouragement to those who want to write proper LEGO fan fiction(s), that no matter how weird or cheesy your story is, you will never write anything as horrific as this (unless you're writing a terrible fan-fiction as a joke, in which case, this should serve as a case of how not to write an enjoyably terrible fan fiction).

 

Read this if you really want to. It's not funny, it's not clever, it's a boring, shoddily-written, utterly stupid fan-fiction about a furry LEGO theme that, in and of itself, wasn't very good.

 

 

-- Ben24x7 --

 

 

THE ORIGINAL TOPIC OP (UN-EDITED):

  Reveal hidden contents
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, I've only read through the first chapter and I have some constructive criticism for you to improve your story writing skills.

  • Spell checking. There was a lot of misspelled words in this story. Make sure you run it through a spell checker before posting. You don't have to do it now though, I have already run it through MS Word and fixed many words for you.
  • Grammar. Some sentences are constructed incorrectly or use the wrong words to describe things. You wrote this:

"His left was blocked by a forest and he would've easily been lost in it, his left was a deep embankment which ended up in a deep moat."

 

You don't need to say the 'left was blocked' as a forest is not a brick wall. By describing the general surroundings like you tried to do, you can assume the reader will understand Fred's circumstances and why he might walk in a particular direction. Writing it the way you did makes it sound like it's a command/response game.

 

"ground like a zit sticking out the skin"

 

I don't think using a 'zit' to describe a hill makes for good reading. Besides, zits vary in shapes and sizes.

  • Visualize your story to avoid saying things that are obvious.

"He looked to his left at which he say what looked like a battlefield. He couldn't tell who was winning or losing ... before he could properly see what the soldiers looked like"

 

Is this battle happening before his eyes? If not, he obviously won't know who is winning/losing. If it is, why does Fred seem invisible to the soldiers so that they just ignore his existence(Yet a bird notices him)?

 

  • No Commentary. Don't add commentary to your stories "(the text in the brackets)", it should explain itself. The first paragraph shouldn't be in the first chapter at all. It ruins the flow of the story.
  • Chapter Transition. Each chapter should flow on to each other. Chapter 1 to 2 in your story reads like this:

"He could just see over the wall and was about to climb over the wall when the wall broke down" to "The wall crumbled and Fred with it. He ripped through a tent-like roof and landed in a pool of water."

 

Wasn't Fred climbing the vine to look over the wall? Was this vine growing out of the wall or from a tree? Somehow the wall broke down itself and Fred managed to teleport inside the fortress in order to fall on a roof.

 

It would be good, if you get a chance, to re-write each chapter with these things in mind. The story sounds interesting, but these things make the story hard to understand.

 

PS. Your post had some bad text formatting which I assume is from copying and pasting from LMB's. I fixed it for you.

 

PPS. Give this story a title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, everything that Cyrem said.

Well I don't know what else to do other than pick through this, line for line.

I've only read the first, er, "Chapter," but honestly I doubt I need read further.

Ugh... here we go.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

I stupidly posted up a link to my story which happens to be on the LMB in a topic where it explained someone (the director of the Lego television series and movies) had died.

Yes that was stupid. Never do it again. But at least you realize you did wrong.

On to the story.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

There is this LEGO CITY minifigure (Brown eyebrows, Jowls, Attitude and police uniform(He is the minifigure who says 'HEY!' in the latest LEGO CITY police boat advertisement)) who is using a rocket to get across the galaxy (LU reference anyone?) and notices a planet which is not marked on star charts.

Nonononono

This is not how you tell a story. Out with the parentheses! NO MORE.

If you want to describe this guy, then for the love of Pinga describe him! Even something as simple as "He has brown eyebrows" would be preferable, still stale but acceptable. This, just, no.

Do not insert your own commentary.

Also, don't ever refer to another work. Never say "the guy from ~~~~" because then you immediately alienate every single reader who does not know ~~~~.

Also, the "there is a xxxx who is xxxx" construction you have going on there, also bad. Try, "A LEGO City Minifigure is using a jet pack to get across the galaxy, when he notices a planet..." much better.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He decides to take a closer look at this new planet.

This line's fine. Moving on.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

I must say that I feel that in a LEGO universe each theme should be on separate planets. And this particular planet had the Legends of Chima theme!

NO! Nonononono.

Out with the persona commentary. NO MORE.

YOU DO NOT BEGIN SENTENCES WITH AND.

I mean, you can in many cases... this is not one of them.

You also referred to another work again! don't do that!

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Anyway, The minifig(whose name was Fred Cop) was flying low over the planet's surface until... BAM!! A missile hit him from nowhere and brought him down.

No.

You tell us his name, then you refer to him by name. His name is something that should have been brought up when you were describing him (which, now that I think on it, never happened.)

Or you could say something like "Fred, as he is called..."

BUT NOT THIS.

Also, you switch tenses here. Up until this point you were using present tense, here it switches to past tense.

Yeah, don't do that.

Pick a tense and stick to it.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

The missile (or whatever it was, Fred couldn't tell) only did a little damage, It only broke a Technic 1x1 half tube off the rocket but it affected one of the tail wings.

I don't know if this is one or two sentences so I'll treat it as one.

So, yet again, ixnay on the arenthesespay, 'kay?

If Fred can't tell what it is, then that should be expressed through the prose. "Fred couldn't tell what had hit him, but he figured it must have been a missile of some sort?" Something like that.

And on 'Technic 1x1 half tube' nonsense. You've crossed the threshold from no description to to much detail. Something like "only a little damage" would actually be fine in this case. If you start giving exact measurements, don't. Estimate. Fred's not carrying a yardstick (I hope) It's not like he could precisely asses he damage done to an object n his back.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred with his rocket came down, down, down, down.... AND SMASHED INTO THE GROUND!!

“Cut out all these exclamation points. An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke.†― F. Scott Fitzgerald.

This guy knows what he's talking about. You should listen to him.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred was knocked out for a while but recovered and realized his rocket was nearly beyond repair.

Not quiiite a run-on, but still to much information for one sentence. You need to work on your pacing.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He decided to take an exploration around the landscape.

"take an exploration" is not, so far as I'm aware, a correct construction in any for of any language.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred happened to have landed on a big slab of rock that pocked out the ground like a zit sticking out the skin, this allowed Fred to scan around the landscape for anything particular.

Were to begin? How about "had landed" instead of "happened to have landed?" 'Pocked' should be 'poked.' A slab of rock is very unlike a zit. You have a run on sentence. 'particular' I think should be 'peculiar.' I need to take a nap.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He looked to his left at which he say what looked like a battlefield.

I UNDERSTAND NOTHING.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He couldn't tell who was winning or losing but before he could properly see what the soldiers looked like a screech shouted behind him.

This may for all I know be technically not entirely incorrect but DEAR LAWD OF THE SOUTH it's confusing. Consider using a comma every now and again. They are your friends. They will love you forever if you treat them well.

Too many quotes, I must double-post now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continued from above post

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred swung around to see a massive bird (or WAS it a bird?) heading towards him!

NO. DON'T. NEVER AGAIN. EITHER IT IS A BIRD, IT IS NOT A BIRD, OR FRED HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE f**** HE IS LOOKING AT. NONE OF THIS, "or was it?" Bulls***. NO.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred dived towards the ground as the bird (or whatever it was) flew over him with a WHOOSH!!!

>_>

<_<

>_<

Nyrgh...

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred straightened himself up and peered at the thing.

"Thing" is a horribly useless word. Guess what? Thing can be anything. Context says he is looking at the may-or-may-not-be bird, but I don't know that. He could be looking at anything. Be more specific. What thing? THE THING THAT JUST FLEW OVER HIM? HM?

Better yet, THE CREATURE?

Please, for my sake, don't call anything a thing.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

It seemed to look like an eagle but it was blue and white and (for some reason as Fred saw) had jets in the rear, it definitely was big but Fred couldn't tell it was a jet that was going in to battle.

Um... How the.. wha...

That is one of the worst run-ons I've seen in quite a while...

Not to mention that none of this made any sense.

I don't even...

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred took another look around. His left was the battlefield and at his right was... wait... what was that in-between?

I don't know, why don't you tell us?

I have never ever heard someone describe a location as "in between his left and his right." Breaking new ground in needlessly convoluted prose? Between his right and his left would be RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM. Call it that.

How he didn't notice something right in front of him? It's possible, even likely considering all that's going on around him, but you can't just gloss over this fact.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred took a long look at what seemed to him as a fortress.

By "as"I think you mean "to be." "What seemed to him to be a fortress."

Otherwise this line is fine.

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

His curiosity took the better of him, he ran towards this fortress while wishing he'd brought a camera with him!

Do i need to break out the Fitzgerald again? Don't exclaim. The reader will decide for thonself whether it's worth shouting about.

Which, BTW, it isn't.

Another run-on sentence. Best way to address this one is to separate it into two. "His curiosity got the better of him. He ran..."

Two sentences.

Also "while wishing he had a camera" is not how I would say that. People don't do things while wishing, they wish while doing other things.

"He wished he had brought a camera as he ran towards the fortress..."

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He finally reached the wall and took a peek at the architecture. It was incredibly detailed, with brick built lion heads around each corner.

This is the one line in this chapter that is actually well-written. Kudos.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

Fred wanted to go to the front but he could not.

Awkwardly stated, but not incorrect. It just doesn't flow.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

His left was blocked by a forest and he would've easily been lost in it, his left was a deep embankment which ended up in a deep moat.

This came up earlier, but I glossed over it... "his left." Just "his left?" How about "to his left" or "on his left" or "to the left of him?" In this case, "the path to his left" would work best.

"and he would've been easily lost in it" would be better stated as "that he would be easily lost in."

Like so:

"The path to his left was blocked by a forest that he would be easily lost in."

Better, right?

Also it seems that both obstacles are "his left."

  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He then looked up to spot a vine than was hung above him. His curiosity, once again, took him over.

Remove "then" and these lines should be fine.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He jumped and caught the vine and climbed up it.

And is not a comma. "He jumped, caught the vine..."
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

It took him a couple of minutes and many attempts to climb up the vine but he made it in the end.

More detail here! Talk about him trying, falling, trying again. The story will be better off for it.
  On 5/6/2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben24x7 said:

He could just see over the wall and was about to climb over the wall when the wall broke down with a  CRRRK!!

You're allowed to use pronouns. After you say "the wall" once you don't need to keep saying "the wall."

"He could just see over the wall and was about to climb over it when it broke down."

I'm not one for onomatopoeia but it's not necessarily a problem. Just don't overuse it.

Well I'm exhausted.

I need to look at puppies now.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol username

Holy crud.

... I honestly have nothing to say, Cyrem and Fushigisaur have already covered pretty much everything... For the first chapter anyway. So I'll just use a gif.

do-not-want-face.gif

Needs work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/6/2013 at 7:35 PM, RobExplorien said:

O_O

 

The amount of literary criticism is huge here. 

 

Yup. I feel sorry for the poor guy. Not that I've had the chance to read the story yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol username

  On 5/6/2013 at 7:39 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

O_O

 

The amount of literary criticism is huge here.

 

Yup. I feel sorry for the poor guy. Not that I've had the chance to read the story yet.

>Implying constructive criticism is a bad thing
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/6/2013 at 7:39 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

O_O

 

The amount of literary criticism is huge here.

 

Yup. I feel sorry for the poor guy. Not that I've had the chance to read the story yet.

Why do you feel sorry for him?

I didn't say anything that isn't true, and to be honest, I tried to be as nice as possible.

But sometimes people produce things that are bad, and if they continue to think that they are good then they will never improve.

We're only helping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't knocking your constructive criticism, it's just if I were in his shoes I would be feeling very small right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol username
  On 5/6/2013 at 7:51 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

I wasn't knocking your constructive criticism, it's just if I were in his shoes I would be feeling very small right now.

So which would you rather have:

  1. You recieve no constructive criticism, and keep working on bigger and bigger projects that are all flawed in the same ways until finally somebody breaks it to you that your work has a lot of problems (or you figure it out on your own later), and by that time you've wasted a ton of time on effort on things that could have been far better (which can absolutely crush all your desire to keep moving forward in that area), or
  2. You receive constructive criticism early on, and perhaps it stings a bit at first, but then you use it to improve and create better things, making your time spent much more productive and eventually leading to you becoming far better at it than you initially were.

I've had the first option happen to me multiple times before, and it set back my work in the project by several months to half a year each time. It sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McJobless

  On 5/6/2013 at 7:51 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

I wasn't knocking your constructive criticism, it's just if I were in his shoes I would be feeling very small right now.

Your insistence that he will be feeling "small" in this situation is probably making him a lot less comfortable than just the criticisms in this topic.

I don't understand how text could be broken before a link, but I'll let that slip and flat-out say you're currently failing to grab my attention. Everything you've written has been more-or-less written before. Fanon is hard work, because you're trying to apply a new story to old material, so you need something powerful to keep potential readers like myself invested. You also need to consider characterisation and use of action, because right now all I can see is a lot of fighting and no real point to it.

I heartly recommened you check out this; http://www.thewritersjourney.com/hero%27s_journey.htm

It's a guide to how most Hollywood screenplays are written. It's a very powerful method of writing, and you might want to adapt your story to follow some of it, because it was specially designed to be interesting.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/6/2013 at 8:03 PM, jamesster said:

You recieve no constructive criticism, and keep working on bigger and bigger projects that are all flawed in the same ways until finally somebody breaks it to you that your work has a lot of problems (or you figure it out on your own later), and by that time you've wasted a ton of time on effort on things that could have been far better (which can absolutely crush all your desire to keep moving forward in that area)

hello deviantart.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/6/2013 at 8:03 PM, jamesster said:

I wasn't knocking your constructive criticism, it's just if I were in his shoes I would be feeling very small right now.

So which would you rather have:

  1. You recieve no constructive criticism, and keep working on bigger and bigger projects that are all flawed in the same ways until finally somebody breaks it to you that your work has a lot of problems (or you figure it out on your own later), and by that time you've wasted a ton of time on effort on things that could have been far better (which can absolutely crush all your desire to keep moving forward in that area), or
  2. You receive constructive criticism early on, and perhaps it stings a bit at first, but then you use it to improve and create better things, making your time spent much more productive and eventually leading to you becoming far better at it than you initially were.

I've had the first option happen to me multiple times before, and it set back my work in the project by several months to half a year each time. It sucks.

 

Point taken, I too would go with the second option. I just felt that perhaps the line-by-line analysis of one member and the awkward gif are a little much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol username
  On 5/6/2013 at 8:50 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

Point taken, I too would go with the second option. I just felt that perhaps the line-by-line analysis of one member and the awkward gif are a little much.

I see it as a line-by-line analysis to learn from and an amusing image posted in an attempt to lighten the mood with humor. :|
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/6/2013 at 8:50 PM, JimbobJeffers said:

Point taken, I too would go with the second option. I just felt that perhaps the line-by-line analysis of one member and the awkward gif are a little much.

Eh, yeah I may have gone overboard there, but I really felt it was the best way to do it. I feel that giving concrete examples of exactly what is wrong and how to fix it is better that just generally saying "I don't like this, fix it."

'course, there's probably a happy medium between these two extremes, but I wouldn't know where to find it.

Also I want to make it clear that I'm not trying to be mean, I'm merely being brutally honest.

The story could be decent, if it is done well, but at the moment it is not.

It should not be considered an insult to tell someone that they did something poorly if they had, in fact, done it poorly.

Now if I had said something along the lines of, say, "your story is bad and you should feel bad! Go crawl in a hole and never show your face again!" Yeah, that's bad, that's insulting and completely unhelpful. But I did not say that, did I?

Rather, I took the better route, rather than simply say it was bad, I took each bad line, told him exactly what is wrong with it, and how to fix it.

Some of the things I said might have been a bit mean, but I had wrote a lot, I was tired, and everyone has their breaking point. I tried to be as objective and level-headed as I could but sometimes I run out of patience.

And yes, like James said, it's better for the criticism to come now so that he doesn't get an even bigger letdown later in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, Ben might be feeling a little small after all that. However, our intentions are good and we are only telling him this to help him improve his writing skills. If he takes it on board and makes the corrections I'm sure it was turn out to be a half decent  story. It has mystery, which is always interesting.

 

And if it makes Ben feel a little better, I have seen far worse.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cyrem, the story was all copied and pasted from the LMB over to here so the words can get jumbled from time to time. I will edit more of the post because my next part is up after a technicle problem LMB moderators had found. And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

after a technicle problem LMB moderators had found.

What else is new there.

  On 5/7/2013 at 1:48 PM, Cyrem said:

And if it makes Ben feel a little better, I have seen far worse.

Considering that it's from the LMBs, it's probably one of the better things I've seen there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

Cyrem mentioned the bird once, and understandably so, as you did say 'Fred dived towards the ground as the bird (or whatever it was) flew over him with a WHOOSH!!!'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

 Research into what? You posted some fan fiction from the LMBs. The focus of this site doesn't affect that. WTF are you even talking about with this bird thing?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/7/2013 at 6:43 PM, Lair of Rockwhales said:

And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

 Research into what? You posted some fan fiction from the LMBs. The focus of this site doesn't affect that. WTF are you even talking about with this bird thing?

A quick search tells me that the "bird" in question is actually this set:

EDIT EDIT: Formatting weirdness let to link being removed, too lazy to get it back.

But, to be fair, there is no way that someone unfamiliar with the Chima theme could have possibly known that from how it was described.

It says there was a blue bird with a jet engine in its ass, so why would anyone think it was something other than a blue bird with a jet engine in its ass?

EDIT: After re-reading the line in question it turns out it does, in fact, say that while it looks like a bird it's really a jet.

My bad. But with how it's written it's an easy mistake to make.

Still doesn't affect the critique in any way, shape, or form.

/EDIT

And while this detail does change the story a bit (which is a fault on the writers end, not the readers end), it does not change a single thing thing that Cyrem said. What he said had nothing to do with the jet-bird-whatever, and one does not need to know what the hell it is to be able to tell you why your writing is bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ace Railgun

That bird...chima...just invaded...

Anywho...I promised my self that I would go all grammer nazi on you but...it does need some work, but it also does have a nice start. I think the main problem is the 'bird's' description. It's kind vague...in my head I thought of a rocket powered eagle :P which was...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcom Isst
  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

Cyrem, the story was all copied and pasted from the LMB over to here so the words can get jumbled from time to time. I will edit more of the post because my next part is up after a technicle problem LMB moderators had found. And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

In the observational standpoint of Mr. Fred Cop, what he saw was identifiable as having ornithological features, but in its brief appearance, it also appeared to have additional features that would indicate that it was not a true avifauna. Thus the descriptor "some sort of unusual avian form," or with reduced vocabulary "some sort of bird thing", would have been appropriate in this case; they do not create a prerequisite of familiarity with Chima canon to understand this event in this story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McJobless

  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

Cyrem, the story was all copied and pasted from the LMB over to here so the words can get jumbled from time to time. I will edit more of the post because my next part is up after a technicle problem LMB moderators had found. And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

Calm. Down. Y u hv 2 b mad?

It seems as though you completely ignored our advice, blamed copy and pasting, LMB and then more-or-less "attacked" (a little too strong) the admin who has been trying to help you (and his posts have been some of the nicest in this entire thread). Now, it's your story, so do what you want with it, but frankly I can't see myself reading this seriously anytime in the future unless the writer gets and attitude change and starts to implement the many things that we have suggested to make your story better.

  On 5/7/2013 at 3:22 PM, Ben24x7 said:

And Cyrem, it is not a bird for goodness sake! You all might as well do some research before diving into all of this. I can understand this fourm is mostly for Rock raiders and other Lego games but please check before you comment!

Focusing on this bit, no-one who isn't regularly checking and memorising LEGO catalogs will have any clue what this is. Cyrem (or at least I don't) doesn't particularly care what it is, because he's not here to learn what sets to buy. He's here to help you. There was no indication for people like myself who don't buy LEGO sets on a regular basis anymore that what you mentioned was a real set. Don't tell us to "check" because there's no way to determine what we need to "check" without being told first.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.